Dear EarthTalk: What environmental and health problems are associated
with the use of chlorine by the paper industry? Is chlorine really
essential in the production of paper? --Misty
Landletter, Tempe, AZ
To achieve its pearly white color, most paper goes through a bleaching
process that uses chlorine or chemicals derived from it (such as chlorine
dioxide). The process also removes lignin, a component of wood fiber that
can eventually turn paper yellow.
Archie Beaton, executive director of the Chlorine-Free Products Association,
says that chlorine produces toxins known as organochlorides, which are
released into the environment through the waste discharges from paper and
pulp mills. They then settle in the fatty tissues and glands of animals
exposed to them, gradually “bio-accumulating” up through the food
chain--that is, after one animal consumes another, its body inherits the
poisons present in its prey. Humans are also affected. In fact, all women
have traces of dioxin, an organochloride, in their breast milk, a disturbing
phenomenon of the chemical age we live in.
According to the Natural Resources Council of Maine, which is based in a
state that has 34 pulp and paper mills, there is compelling scientific
evidence that dioxins can cause cancer, birth and developmental defects,
learning disabilities, increased risk of diabetes, decreased fertility,
reduced sperm counts, endometriosis, and suppressed immune systems in
people. Developing fetuses and breast-feeding infants are particularly
sensitive to the harmful effects of dioxin.
Alternatives to conventional, chlorine-bleached papers do exist. According
to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), “totally
chlorine free,” or TCF, paper uses alternative methods, including hydrogen
peroxide and oxygen, to bleach paper. One small downside of TCF paper is
that it can have no recycled content, because papers used to make recycled
paper might have been previously bleached with chlorine. So it is made from
100 percent virgin fiber.
Another option is “processed-chlorine free,” or PCF, paper that not only
rids the bleaching process of chlorine, but can also have up to 100 percent
recycled content. For paper to be labeled PCF, it needs a minimum of 30
percent “post-consumer” content (paper actually once used and not just
trimmings from print shops), and the re-bleaching process cannot include
chlorine-containing compounds. It’s not totally chlorine-free, because
chlorine may have been in the post-consumer material used to make it.
The third type of chlorine-free paper, “elementally chlorine-free,” or ECF,
is the most controversial. It uses chlorine derivatives, such as chlorine
dioxide, that CIWMB says can “still produce toxic chlorinated organic
compounds, including chloroform, a known carcinogen.” The American Forest
and Paper Association claims that many pulp mills across the country have
switched to ECF, and it now accounts for 96 percent of bleached chemical
pulp production in the U.S. “Dioxin cannot be detected in wastewater being
discharged from [ECF] pulp and paper mills,” says the trade group.
GOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The
Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; or submit your
question at:
www.emagazine.com, or e-mail us at:
earthtalk@emagazine.com.
Dear EarthTalk: I've heard about mad cow disease, but what is mad
deer disease? --
Janet Bristol, Eugene, OR
“Mad deer disease” is a transmissible disease similar to mad cow
disease, but it occurs in deer and elk instead of cattle. Called “spongiform
encephalopathy,” but also known as “chronic wasting disease” (CWD), it was
first discovered in 1967 on a Colorado wildlife research facility. It has
since spread slowly through the mule deer, white-tailed deer and elk
populations, mostly in western states. Mile Miller of the Colorado Division
of Wildlife describes CWD as “an epidemic occurring in slow motion.”
The disease is found mostly in Colorado and Wyoming, where it infects about
one percent of free-ranging deer, but about five percent of mule deer on
game farms, due to the animals’ closer proximity to one another which
facilitates the spread of the disease. Infected animals have also been found
on game farms in Nebraska, Montana, South Dakota and Oklahoma. Game farms
sell meat and the velvet from antlers (marketed as a health supplement or
aphrodisiac), or sometimes ship live animals to other states to bulk up
their supply of hunting targets. Thus one farm with infected animals could
potentially spread the disease far and wide.
Some health analysts fear that there could be a link between mad deer
disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), a similar type of spongiform
encephalopathy that kills humans when brain proteins called “prions” deform,
forcing other brain cells to degenerate along with them. Between 1997 and
2000, two deer hunters and a woman who regularly ate venison (deer meat)
died from CJD. According to Dr. Ermias Belay of the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, the three deaths raise concern because of the
unusually young age of those infected. All three were under 30, while CJD
usually only strikes people older than 45.
While scientists found no conclusive evidence linking the deaths to mad deer
disease, they also couldn't rule it out. And a National Institutes of Health
report released last year warned that the transmission of spongiform
encephalopathy between species is possible: “Infected tissues could
be eaten by predators or enjoyed by aficionados of wild game. And carcasses
could be rendered for feed that (by error) could find its way to cattle.”
Since 2002, hunters have donated some 200,000 deer and elk kills each fall
to scientists looking to tabulate the prevalence of spongiform
encephalopathy in American deer and elk populations in efforts to establish
links to CJD. But the very states where mad-deer infection is highest also
rely heavily on the sale of hunting licenses, making them loath to publicize
the fact that eating venison could be dangerous. And indeed, even while
scientists continue to look for clues, thousands of hunters and their
families continue to eat venison with little if any concern about CJD.
GOT AN ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The
Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; or submit your
question at:
www.emagazine.com, or e-mail us at:
earthtalk@emagazine.com.